Quote:

Known bug. Found and fixed. The fix will be in 1.1.3.

Quote:


The answer is yes. Just use one of the 30 or so box types in SDesigner.

Part 1

I tried changing the programming both to yes (without the quotes) and to 1; however neither worked.   (I probably should have mentioned in my initial question that I had tried other variations of "yes", such as "1", "true", etc.).

Since the previous reply indicates that this is a known flaw that will be fixed in the next release, I am no longer concerned about it.

Part 2

Once again, I'm embarrassed.  The only "term" I could think of for the box was "text box" because I use it so often in MS Word to enclose something in a box.  Your answer got me "back to basics" and what could be easier than inserting a box.

There is ONLY ONE PROBLEM. I inadvertently placed a box around one of the check mark boxes.  While I see the option to change the box "style" I do not see an option for "no box."  What do I do to retain the check mark field but get rid of the box around it?

Part 3

No, I have not registered for the User Conference since (unfortunately for me), I will probably not be able to attend.

Thanks for asking.

OK - I found "part" of my update problem.  I had inadvertently (I've just got to get more advertent again!  lol) used a name twice ... so Sesame added a "0" to the second field.  My mass update did work, but on the wrong field.  (Fortunately, it only affected 3 records out of hundreds - so it was an easy "fix"). 

My problem remains with the "appearance" of the check box (where I have to hover over it to see it's true state) and I guess that is the part that was fixed.

So, now the only thing left is to get rid of the box I placed around one of my check boxes.

I tried that; however, I am not able to highlight just the box AROUND the check box without highlighting the entire checkbox.

Ray -

As I just posted, I am unable to highlight the box without highlighting the entire field.

In case I am being unclear - or overlooking something - here's a little more detail. 

There are 3 boxes involved.

1.  The checkbox itself which automatically appears as a box when the layout element is added.  Let's say there are two of these.

2.  One - and only one of the check boxes has a box "around" it; i.e. if you look at the layout element it shows a "type" of box.   As I said previously, I do not see any option in the editor to select "no box" ... only the "style" of the box.

3.  The OTHER check box - when viewing the properties shows "no box."

4.  Finally, around the two check boxes (one not enclosed in a box and the other which is enclosed in a box), I have another box around both of them to keep them together as a "group."

When trying to delete the box described in 2 above, I first removed the surrounding box described in 4 above.  I know I'm repeating myself but I want to make the point that the check box with it's "surrounding" box is now standing free and clear of anything else.  I am not able to grab anything but the entire checkbox field itself.

I hope this helps clarify the situation and that I can get a suggestion that will work (hopefully, short of removing the box completely and then adding a new element back to my form).

Thanks!

Well Ray, I was able to fix the problem that way.  I would strongly suggest that the programmers take another look at this element and the way it works.

No wonder I couldn't remove the box.  To remove it you are telling me that I had to first choose the box and then tell Sesame not to fill it in order to get rid of it. 

It just ain't logical somehow and I'm sure could be made easier.

In any event, thanks for helping me get my form designed the way I want it.